Labour promised MPs a vote on Trump trade deal - now Starmer doesn't seem so sure

Will MPs get a vote on a trade deal with Donald Trump? It used to be Labour policy, though Sir Keir Starmer didn't sound keen on the idea at Prime Minister's Questions.

The PM was challenged, first by Lib Dem MP Clive Jones, who wants a guarantee that parliament has the final say on any trade deal, including one with the US. "This idea is not new," said Clive, who used to be a director of various toy companies, and was president, chairman and director of the British Toy and Hobby Association, no less.

"It's exactly what Labour promised to do in an official policy paper put forward in 2021, so I am asking this government to keep their promise," he continued. And, toying with the PM, he complained: "Currently, members of parliament have no vote or voice on trade deals." In reply, Sir Keir gave one of those non-answers we're becoming used to at PMQs, saying rather tetchily: "As he knows, parliament has a well-established role in scrutinising and ratifying trade deals." Later, Sir Ed Davey had a go.

"Will the government give MPs a vote on the floor of the House on any deal he agrees with President Trump? Yes or no?" he asked. He fared no better.

Sir Keir said again: "If it is secured, it will go through the known procedures for this House." Read more on the trade deal:US 'positive' on talksDeal 'possible' but not 'certain' So what are parliament's "well-established role" and "the known procedures"? And what exactly did Labour promise in opposition back in 2021? The 2021 promise was, in fact, one of those worthy pledges parties make in opposition and then either conveniently forget about or water down when they're in government. U-turn if you want to.

The policy paper referred to by Mr Jones was: "Labour's trade policy: putting workers first" - published in September 2021 by Emily Thornberry when she was shadow international trade secretary. The secretary of state at the time was none other than Liz Truss.

Whatever happened to her? Come to think of it, whatever happened to Emily Thornberry? Back then idealistic Emily declared in her policy paper: "We will reform the parliamentary scrutiny of trade agreements… "So that MPs have a guaranteed right to debate the proposed negotiating objectives for future trade deals, and a guaranteed vote on the resulting agreements…" A guaranteed vote. Couldn't be clearer.

And there was more from Emily. "…with sufficient time set aside for detailed scrutiny both of the draft treaty texts and of accompanying expert analysis on the full range of implications, including for workers' rights." Sufficient time for detailed scrutiny.

Again, couldn't be clearer. Then came a section headed: Parliamentary Scrutiny of Trade Deals.

"The Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 (CRAG) dictates that international treaties (including trade agreements) must be laid before parliament for a period of 21 sitting days before they can become law," we were told back then. "At present, a treaty can only be challenged and (temporarily) rejected by means of an opposition day debate, if one is granted by the government within that time.

"The CRAG legislation was agreed by parliament before Brexit was on the horizon. Its procedures for the ratification of trade treaties, which were then negotiated and agreed at EU level, were given no consideration during the passage of the Act, and no one envisaged that they would become the mechanism for parliamentary scrutiny of the government's post-Brexit trade deals… "Despite the flagrant evidence of the inadequacy of the CRAG Act to allow proper oversight of trade deals, the government repeatedly blocked numerous cross-party proposals to improve the processes for parliamentary scrutiny and approval during passage of the 2021 Trade Act.

"A future Labour government will return to those proposals, and learn from best practice in other legislatures, to ensure that elected MPs have all the time, information and opportunity they need to debate and vote on the UK's trade deals, both before negotiations begin and after they conclude." So what's changed from the heady days of Liz Truss as trade secretary and Labour's bold pledges in opposition? Labour's in government now, that's what. Hence the U-turn, it seems.

Parliament's role may be, as Sir Keir told MPs, "well-established". But that, according to opponents, is the problem.

It's contrary to what Labour promised in opposition. ????Listen to Politics at Sam and Anne's on your podcast app???? Sir Ed hit back at the PM: "I'm very disappointed in that reply.

There was no 'yes' or 'no' response. We do want a vote, and we will keep pressing him and his government on that." And true to their word, Mr Jones and another Lib Dem MP, Richard Foord, have already tabled private member's bills demanding a final say on any trade deal with President Trump.

Watch this space. And also watch out for Labour MPs also backing demands for a Commons vote on a Trump trade deal before long..