Search

Shopping cart

Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Scottish government 'utterly irresponsible' over bottle return scheme, court told

The Scottish government was "utterly irresponsible" in the way it attempted to implement its bottle return scheme, a former UK government minister has claimed.

Giving evidence at the Court of Session in Edinburgh on Friday, former Scottish secretary Lord Alister Jack said the Scottish government had withheld "commercial information" from businesses about a risk the deposit return scheme (DRS) would be blocked. Lord Jack was Scottish secretary when the UK government refused to grant the DRS an exemption for glass bottles under the Internal Market Act (IMA).

This led to the Scottish government changing its plans for the scheme in 2023. A UK-wide DRS is planned but it is not expected to begin before 2027.

Biffa Waste Services is suing the Scottish government, seeking £166m of reparations over the decision to delay the scheme. Lord Jack said he was "appalled" by a letter sent to firms about the scheme by then circular economy minister Lorna Slater in May 2022, which he said "misled" businesses about the true commercial picture.

"I am staggered that a letter was produced by officials and signed by a minister and sent out to companies that were investing their shareholders money or their own money - and lots of it - and not knowing the inherent risks of the whole picture," he said. He added: "It was, for me, irresponsible not to tell companies that are spending money what the whole story is, and explain to them the risks.

"There was a high level of risk and it was utterly irresponsible to send this letter, and that's my opinion." Read more:Lorna Slater gave 'emphatic' assurance about DRS, court told Lord Jack said the letters were sent after the government had been made aware it would need to apply for an exclusion from the IMA, which he claimed had been made clear by the UK government in March 2022. He said an exclusion from the IMA had a "high bar" and required impact assessments to be carried out.

However, he said the government had done "nothing" to advance this work or to warn businesses of the risks before it formally applied for an exclusion in March 2023. As soon as they knew this was required, he said "they should have sharpened up, got their exclusion request in, told their partners it was what they were doing, told their partner companies there was massive commercial risk for them".

Lord Jack said that as Scottish secretary he had a number of "concerns" about the scheme, including the impact it would have on companies and consumers, and its impact on inflation at a time of the cost of living crisis. He said more than 1,000 businesses and stakeholders had written to him "saying it was going to seriously impact and damage their business, supermarkets telling me it was going to damage their business, consumers and so on".

He dismissed the suggestion his concerns were politically motivated, insisting it was "beholden" to him as Scottish secretary to "ensure our businesses and our consumers were protected". The Conservative peer said the fact the Scottish government was still working out how the scheme would work when it applied for an IMA exclusion in 2023 was "farcical".

He said: "It was a comedy of errors. Farcical.

The whole thing was farcical.".

Prev Article
Tech Innovations Reshaping the Retail Landscape: AI Payments
Next Article
The Rise of AI-Powered Personal Assistants: How They Manage

Related to this topic:

Comments

By - Tnews 24 Oct 2025 5 Mins Read
Email : 1

Related Post