Search

Shopping cart

Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Church of England charities reprimanded for handling of sexual assault allegations against former bishop

Two Church of England charities have been criticised over safeguarding failures following the resignation of former bishop of Liverpool John Perumbalath.

The Charity Commission said the Liverpool Diocesan Board of Finance and the Chelmsford Diocesan Board of Finance had failed to properly handle safeguarding allegations against John Perumbalath. The commission said failings in handling allegations against Mr Perumbalath "amount to mismanagement in the administration of the two charities".

Mr Perumbalath, the former bishop of Liverpool, stood down a year ago after Channel 4 News reported that one woman had accused him of kissing her without consent and groping her, and another accused him of sexual harassment. Last year, Mr Perumbalath vehemently denied the allegations and, in his retirement letter, published online, he reiterated his denial.

He said he had complied with any investigation from the Church's safeguarding team. The warning for the Chelmsford charity found there had been a "failure ongoing over a period of about two years" to report a serious incident to the commission relating to a complaint made in January 2023 about allegations of sexual misconduct by Mr Perumbalath when he was bishop of Bradwell.

Trustees of the Liverpool charity, it found, "failed to consider or investigate" a complaint against Mr Perumbalath and failed to "act in the charity's best interests and to take reasonable steps to protect from harm people who come into contact with the charity". The Commission said on Friday that "in both instances, due to lack of appropriate procedures and processes, those trustees who knew of the allegations failed to take action that would have allowed the trustee boards to fully consider any risks and make a decision on the appropriate action to take".

Both charities had "insufficient processes and procedures in place to ensure adequate oversight of safeguarding and protection of those who come into contact with the charity.

Prev Article
Tech Innovations Reshaping the Retail Landscape: AI Payments
Next Article
The Rise of AI-Powered Personal Assistants: How They Manage

Related to this topic:

Comments

By - Tnews 16 Jan 2026 5 Mins Read
Email : 0

Related Post