Search

Shopping cart

Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Children can claim 'lost years' damages caused by medical negligence, Supreme Court rules

Children can receive damages for the years of their life that will be lost because of medical negligence, the Supreme Court has ruled.

The decision by the UK's highest court overturns a legal ruling from 45 years ago and could lead to the NHS having to pay millions of pounds to patients harmed by botched procedures. A 1981 Court of Appeal judgment stated children cannot receive damages despite adults and teenagers being allowed to do so under the law.

It found that children could not receive damages on the basis they did not have any "dependants". But the Supreme Court's ruling in London on Wednesday said this was "incorrect" and was "inconsistent…with legal principle".

The decision comes after a child, known only as CCC, sued Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust in 2020. CCC was diagnosed with cerebral palsy following a severe brain injury, which was caused by clinical negligence by the trust and left the child requiring 24-hour care.

In the High Court ruling in 2023, Mr Justice Ritchie said that CCC suffered a severe shortage of oxygen to the brain before and during her birth, which caused cerebral palsy, with her life expectancy reduced to 29. Mr Justice Ritchie awarded CCC a total of £6,866,615, which included the costs of care and equipment, but declined to order that the trust pay "lost years" damages, stating that he was "bound" by the 1981 Court of Appeal decision.

Read more from Sky News:Big fall in household energy bills predicted from AprilWarmer weather is on its way to the UK, say forecasters CCC's mother then took the case to the Supreme Court on behalf of the child, with the challenge heard over two days in February last year. By a four-to-one majority, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal and ordered that the case be sent back to the High Court so "lost years" damages could be assessed.

In his ruling, Lord Reed said "whatever the age of the claimant.

Prev Article
Tech Innovations Reshaping the Retail Landscape: AI Payments
Next Article
The Rise of AI-Powered Personal Assistants: How They Manage

Related to this topic:

Comments

By - Tnews 18 Feb 2026 5 Mins Read
Email : 0

Related Post