Search

Shopping cart

Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Board Governance and Managerial Short-Term Incentives (Report)

Board Governance and Managerial Short-Term Incentives (Report)

Because of the separation of ownership and control, modern corporations are run by professional managers. But, since Berle and Means (1932), the separation of ownership and control has been criticized for managers' more discretion. In general, managers' interests do not coincide with stockholders' interests and the agency problem between managers and stockholders happens. Fama and Jensen (1983) suggest that market for takeover as an external control mechanism and board as an internal control mechanism can help solve agency problems. Hostile takeovers are a powerful governance mechanism because they offer the possibility of bypassing the management to take permanent control of the company, but also disruptive and costly at the same time. Thus, the corporate governance by the board is gathering public attention dramatically.

Comments